Professor Cassell, along with lawyer James Marsh, have pursued many in this illegal marketplace on Amy’s behalf, and she has obtained between $1 million and $2 million so far. For them, the enemy is the market itself, and so it makes little sense to apportion damages differently according to the role that was played by a given market participant, or to burden the victim with having to prove how this perpetrator registered this harm.
Read More
Justia: Verdict at
http://verdict.justia.com/2014/01/23/supreme-court-hears-oral-argument-paroline-v-unknown-amy-case-regarding-restitution-child-pornography-victims
Leave a Reply