The Supreme Court left no doubt on Wednesday that it is willing to do its part to make sure that victims of child pornography get paid money to offset the harm done to them. But it also found itself very much in doubt about just what that part would be. The answer in the case of Paroline v. United States may depend upon how the Court understands two words: “apportion” and “contribution.”
Read More
SCOTUS Blog at
http://www.scotusblog.com/2014/01/argument-recap-sorting-out-the-blame/
Leave a Reply