But should he really be stuck with the whole bill since he didn’t cause the whole harm? Maybe he should only have to pay restitution for the portion of the 3.4 million harm caused by his looking at those two pictures. And how do you calculate that? That’s what the Court will try to work out in his case.
Read More
Gamso - For the Defense at
http://gamso-forthedefense.blogspot.com/2014/01/paroline-haugen-maharaj-catching-up-on.html
Leave a Reply